This week Rep. Drazkowski introduced H.F. 1871
1.2 relating to the Minnesota Constitution; proposing an amendment to the
1.3 Minnesota Constitution, article XIII, by adding a section; providing that a
1.4 marriage between a man and a woman is the only domestic legal union that shall1.5 be valid or recognized in Minnesota.
1.6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.7 Section 1. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROPOSED.
1.8 An amendment to the Minnesota Constitution is proposed to the people. If the
1.9 amendment is adopted, a section shall be added to article XIII, to read:
1.10 Sec. 13. A marriage between a man and a woman is the only domestic legal union that
1.11 shall be valid or recognized in Minnesota.
1.12 Sec. 2. SUBMISSION TO VOTERS.
1.13 The proposed amendment must be submitted to the people at the 2010 general
1.14 election. The question submitted must be:
1.15 “Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to provide that a marriage between
1.16 a man and a woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized
Under the pretense of liberty, I don’t believe the State or Federal Governments should recognize any marriage. Marriage is defined by God and the States attempt at legislating morality in nonsensical.
Hebrews 13:4 (New International Version)
Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral.
The only reason a government would want to recognize anything is so they can try to control behavior and tax us on it.
[...] week I wrote about Minnesota’s own marriage ammendment only to realize we don’t have only 1 bill in the house for this ammendment, we have [...]